Serena Williams’ Win at Stanford: Just the Starting Line

Serena Williams at Stanford

Serena Williams was always going to win another tournament. That was inevitable. So the news this weekend, when she won the Bank of the West Classic at Stanford, wasn’t that she had won for the first time since Wimbledon in 2010. It was seen as a finish line to her comeback from a year off with illness (blood clots in her lungs) and injury (foot surgery). But it was much more important than that.

It was the starting line.

This tournament was evidence that Williams really did feel some vulnerability, did feel a lack of invincibility.

“I was really disappointed at Wimbledon,’’ she said on ESPN after crushing Maria Sharapova in the quarterfinals. “I put a lot of pressure on myself. That’s a big tournament for me. I decided it’s time to get serious, not only at the slams, but at every other tournament as well.’’

Every. Other. Tournament. Let’s call them EOTs. She hasn’t cared about them  in years, choosing instead to lose on purpose, and early, or not show up at all, claiming injury to keep out of mandatory events. She has seen them as burdens.

At one tournament two years ago, she said she didn’t want to play, but went anyway because to avoid being fined $75,000. That was the same amount she had budgeted, she said, for new furniture to remodel one of her homes. Then, she quit in the middle of her first match and went home.

But let’s face it: Bank of the West Classic, while a good tournament, is not Wimbledon, and she clearly did try. Reports were that she was working hard, even in the morning of her matches. She joked that she thought maybe she’d start doing something new, like warming up.

I thought she could step right into Wimbledon and win, right after the long layoff. Deep down, she surely thought the same thing. Instead, she lost in the fourth round, and the questions then were undeniable. About to turn 30, is she able to get her old form back? Is the game actually progressing, gaining on her, with some young stars, such as Wimbledon champ Petra Kvitova?

“I’m so 2000,’’ Williams joked.

Well, she can get it back, but maybe not as easily as before. I think that’s what she learned at Wimbledon. The choice then is to let the game pass you by, or to fight back.

Williams apparently is not ready to start letting her career fade away. And if she’s going to fight to get her old spot back, then she might turn out to be better than she was before. For once, something might be pushing her.

It’s going to take some effort between majors, at the EOTs. And she says she’s willing to do it.

“Before everything went downhill, I liked tennis. I loved going on tour, loved playing,’’ she said. “But now, I just REALLY love it. I love every moment out there. Just having an opportunity out there. . .I almost missed my chance for the rest of my life. I really missing being out there, really miss the atmosphere.’’

She had said some of those same things while she was out. But I’m guessing she thought there was no one in her way back to the top. Honestly, that’s what I thought, too.

If Williams is going to start trying at EOTs, then that’s because she sees it as the best path to win majors. It also might mean that while she was out, she missed the process.

Or, it might mean that she’s just saying what she thinks people want to hear. It’s not easy to be sure. She did play Martina Hingis in World Team Tennis a few weeks ago and gave zero effort the first half of the set.

Still, this past week it was apparently she had been working harder. Sharapova looked scared to death when Williams beat her 6-1, 6-3. Serena scared the serve right out of her; it was complete intimidation. Sabine Lisicki, ranked No. 26, was scared in the semis against Williams, too.

And in the finals, Williams went down a break in the first set to Marion Bartoli. She broke back, then rolled, 7-5, 6-1. In five matches, she lost one set, and more than two games in a set just three times.

That makes three tournaments back for Williams now, who is already the big favorite to win the U.S. Open.

Here’s hoping that Williams’ rediscovery of her love of the game, and the motivation to work, will stick for the long term. No one has ever questioned her ability, but only whether she makes the most of her potential.

Imagine what she can do if she wants.

About gregcouch

I can talk tennis all day long, and often do. And yet some of the people I talk to about it might rather I talk about something else. Or with someone else. That’s how it is with tennis, right? Sort of an addiction. Sort of a high. I am a national columnist at and a FoxSports1 TV insider, and have been a columnist at the Chicago Sun-Times. In 2010, I was the only American sports writer to cover the full two weeks of all four majors, and also to cover each of the U.S. Masters series events. I’ve seen a lot of tennis, talked with a lot of players, coaches, agents. I watched from a few rows behind the line judge as Serena rolled her foot onto the baseline for the footfault, a good call, at the 2009 U.S. Open. I sat forever watching a John Isner marathon, leaving for Wimbledon village to watch an England World Cup soccer game at a pub and then returning for hours of Isner, sitting a few feet from his wrecked coach. I got to see Novak Djokovic and Robin Soderling joke around on a practice court on the middle Sunday at Wimbledon, placing a small wager on a tiebreaker. Djokovic won, and Soderling pulled a bill out of his wallet, crumpled it into his fist and threw it at Djokovic, who unwadded it, kissed it, and told me, “My work is done here.’’ And when Rafael Nadal won the French Open in 2010, I finished my column, walked back out onto the court, and filled an empty tic tac container with the red clay. I’m looking at it right now. Well, I don’t always see the game the same way others do. I can be hard on tennis, particularly on the characters in suits running it. Tennis has no less scandal and dirt than any other game. Yet somehow, it seems to be covered up, usually from an incredible web of conflicts of interest. I promise to always tell the truth as I see it. Of course, I would appreciate it if you’d let me know when I’m wrong. I love sports arguments and hope to be in a few of them with you here. Personal info: One-handed backhand, serve-and-volleyer. View all posts by gregcouch

2 responses to “Serena Williams’ Win at Stanford: Just the Starting Line

  • sissi

    as usual you’re hating on Serena, can you once admit she’s that good instead of your usual blah blah about her intimidation and your rubbish theories about tanking? you spent your whole time hating, never once you admit she’s good, you’re just not a a good journalist

  • Zech

    Good article. I don’t agree with everything but its not the first time these arguments have been made. One problem with your World Team Tennis issue…it is WORLD TEAM TENNIS. An exhibition tour practically. There’s no way she or any top singles players need to give anything close to 100%.

    And the usual observer’s warning: you tread a slippery slope when criticizing what an athlete does with his or her talent as it is his/her life. Especially when they’ve already accomplished much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: