WIMBLEDON: Novak Djokovic Beats Roger Federer, Wins Title, Ends Career, Um, Crisis?

DownloadedFile-4

 

When Novak Djokovic was younger and still on the outskirts of greatness, he was always known for his melodrama. It was one overplayed ailment after another. And the crowd in New York booed him, and Andy Roddick apparently punched him, or close. And in Australia, where he ran to the bathroom during a match and his opponent, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga was asked when he noticed something was wrong with Djokovic. Tsonga replied, “Five years ago.”

Times have changed, and respect has grown, but I’m having difficulty accepting the new narrative that Djokovic’ career was in some sort of crisis. He is 27, has reached the heights of his profession that few have reached. He has done it by winning his fair share against Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, possibly the two greatest players of all time. He has made an insane amount of money, won an insane amount of matches, had an insane amount of fun. And he’s about to get married and become a father.

That ain’t a crisis. But Djokovic beat Federer Sunday to win Wimbledon in a classic, 6-7 (9-7), 6-4, 7-6 (7-4), 5-7, 6-4. And when it was over, Djokovic said this:

“At this time in my career, for this Grand Slam trophy to arrive is crucial, especially after losing several Grand Slam finals in a row. I started doubting, of course, a little bit. I needed this win a lot.”

Djokovic did not NEED this win. Not for his legacy, which was already set for greatness, and not for the confidence to win more majors. He was always going to win more. This match is the defining moment of Djokovic’ career, but not because it pulled him out of some imaginary hole. It is because he finally beat Federer the Great in an epic Wimbledon final.

It was the guy he beat, the way he kept getting back up and the place he did it. All of that combined.

images-2

To be honest, the narrative on Federer is wrong, too. He’s 32, and people saw this as his last, best chance to win another major.

Wrong. Federer has finally found confidence now that he finally — FINALLY — switched to a modern racquet that gives him more power and allows him to fend off those who are crushing the ball at him. He is going to have to get more comfortable hitting forehands with it, but the point is that he has plenty more runs at majors in him now.

God knows how many majors Federer threw away by stubbornly sticking with that ancient, outdated stick.

The thing is, Federer looked more confident these past two weeks than he has in a few years. I doubt he feels this was his last chance. Djokovic’ brain was telling him that he was in crisis.

Talk about melodrama. He had lost his past three major finals, and five of his past six.. And he was not only fighting off a choker-label from the outside, but also from within. He was wondering what had gone wrong, and he hired Boris Becker to coach him on finishing the job.

But there was nothing wrong with Djokovic’ game. You cannot win six major championships, as he had before Sunday, and still be a choker.

Djokovic was still reaching the finals of majors, but he lost a few to Andy Murray, and he lost to Rafael Nadal on clay at the French Open. Look, there is no shame in losing to Rafael Nadal at Roland Garros.

A few years ago at some major, I don’t remember which one, I asked Nadal about losing major finals. He said it was hard, but that he felt the job was to get in position to win majors. The more major finals he reached, the more chances he gave himself to win. Just keep going back, keep going back, and the wins will come.

Sure, the old Buffalo Bills might not agree with that. But Phil Mickelson was once considered a choker until he got himself in position enough times. Same with Andre Agassi. And Murray.

Djokovic had a historically great year, and then Nadal altered his game and Murray raised his. And Djokovic was not going to win every match for the rest of his life. If anything, he had a letdown after that year. It was only natural.

And now that he has won Wimbledon again, moved into eighth place on the all-time list with seven majors, and surpassed Nadal again in the rankings to No. 1, I have some news for him: He’s still not going to win every major final.

This was a made-up crisis, though if you truly believe in your mind that something is wrong, then maybe you can make it real.

What Sunday’s match did for Djokovic was move him into tennis-legend status. He is still on the outside of Federer-Nadal looking in, even though he has beaten both of them in big matches. They cast the biggest-possible shadows.

As great as this match was, it still falls behind Nadal’s famous win over Federer on Centre Court. Still, there is something about epic matches, in major finals, that draw the eye and attention and reviews. Djokovic has beaten Murray in finals, but those guys have nearly the exact same game, which tends to make the matches a little boring.

Djokovic has beaten Nadal in big matches, but not at the French, Nadal’s turf. This was a win on Federer’s turf in the biggest spotlight. It carries a permanence for Djokovic.

The amazing thing he did Sunday was to keep coming back. He had set points in the first set, but lost it anyway. He had a 5-2 lead, and then match points in the fourth set, but lost that anyway. Federer won five games in a row there, and had all the momentum.

Djokovic should have been crushed.

In another epic Wimbledon final all tennis fans remember, John McEnroe knocked back Bjorn Borg like that in the fourth set, winning a marathon tiebreaker. Years later, both players still say they can’t believe Borg came back to win the fifth set.

That match still lives with both of them. This one will live with Djokovic. From here, he will have more ups and more majors. He will get to 10. And he will also have downs, and lose big ones, too.
But those will not be a crisis for this superchampion. If anyone, including Djokovic, thinks he hasn’t reached that level, then I’m going to say the days of melodrama might not be completely gone.

Djokovic has won seven majors in the era of Federer and Nadal.

Nobody has called Federer and Nadal the “Big Two” in years.

About gregcouch

I can talk tennis all day long, and often do. And yet some of the people I talk to about it might rather I talk about something else. Or with someone else. That’s how it is with tennis, right? Sort of an addiction. Sort of a high. I am a national columnist at FoxSports.com and a FoxSports1 TV insider, and have been a columnist at the Chicago Sun-Times. In 2010, I was the only American sports writer to cover the full two weeks of all four majors, and also to cover each of the U.S. Masters series events. I’ve seen a lot of tennis, talked with a lot of players, coaches, agents. I watched from a few rows behind the line judge as Serena rolled her foot onto the baseline for the footfault, a good call, at the 2009 U.S. Open. I sat forever watching a John Isner marathon, leaving for Wimbledon village to watch an England World Cup soccer game at a pub and then returning for hours of Isner, sitting a few feet from his wrecked coach. I got to see Novak Djokovic and Robin Soderling joke around on a practice court on the middle Sunday at Wimbledon, placing a small wager on a tiebreaker. Djokovic won, and Soderling pulled a bill out of his wallet, crumpled it into his fist and threw it at Djokovic, who unwadded it, kissed it, and told me, “My work is done here.’’ And when Rafael Nadal won the French Open in 2010, I finished my column, walked back out onto the court, and filled an empty tic tac container with the red clay. I’m looking at it right now. Well, I don’t always see the game the same way others do. I can be hard on tennis, particularly on the characters in suits running it. Tennis has no less scandal and dirt than any other game. Yet somehow, it seems to be covered up, usually from an incredible web of conflicts of interest. I promise to always tell the truth as I see it. Of course, I would appreciate it if you’d let me know when I’m wrong. I love sports arguments and hope to be in a few of them with you here. Personal info: One-handed backhand, serve-and-volleyer. View all posts by gregcouch

One response to “WIMBLEDON: Novak Djokovic Beats Roger Federer, Wins Title, Ends Career, Um, Crisis?

  • Tammy

    great submit, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite specialists of this
    sector do not realize this. You must continue your writing.

    I’m confident, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: